History vs. Hollywood Cleopatra VII Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

History vs. Hollywood Cleopatra VII - Term Paper ExampleHence, Hollywoods magnetic variation of history is a combination of both fact and fiction. The substance of this prose will focus on Cleopatra, one of the most celebrated personalities both in the sure world and the silver screen. The latter was portrayed by Elizabeth Taylor in the 1963 adaptation titled Cleopatra.The photographic film closely follows the actual events but as is expected, there argon some aspects that are spiced up, exaggerated or simply omitted due to the lack of appeal. Contrary to eminent historians, Cleopatras flawless beauty is the prime theme of the pictorial matter that is actually why men were drawn towards her. However, in reality Cleopatras beauty was neither jaw-dropping nor capable of driving men insane. In truth, Cleopatra wasnt the fine-looking lass that Elizabeth Taylor depicted her to be in fact, she was a physically unattractive woman, who used her wit and wisdom as her primary tools of sed uction (Grout 2012). The characterization of Caesar was to a fault erroneous as he had neer wished to be made emperor or dictator it had been one of the fears held by the senate that eventually lead to his assassination. Furthermore, the movie withal depicted how Caesar and Cleopatras affair had become increasingly public and the fact that Cleopatra bore him a son named Caesarion. In the movie, it is shown that Caesar publicly accepts his illegitimate son, Caesarion. Whereas in reality, Caesarion was never acknowledged by Caesar and much to Cleopatras ire, Octavian Caesars nephew was proclaimed his heir.Caesar and Cleopatra had never married each other unlike the movie depiction. Historians have stated that Cleopatras and Caesars relationship was more of a political alliance than a romantic one that suited both individuals their relationship is greatly dramatized in the movie. Nevertheless, the movie plot still followed the actual events closely and it did incorporate some very in teresting details of history. The method through